Abbey and Grady Lesson Plan
Snacks:
Salty (extended play) → Salt and vinegar chips
Decencies → (French cuisine) cream puffs
Never after → apple flavored things
A Half Red Sea → Fruit punch
Goals:
- Learn the pitfalls of “pigeonholing” writing into one style or aesthetic
- Discuss the difference between innovative poetry and avant-garde poetry and what’s at stake in defining “innovative”
- See how biography differs from self-representational writing
Outline:
Biography Powerpoint (Grady), 3:10-3:20pm
- Background
- BAM & Mullen (Thorsson & Intro)
- What is/are black aesthetics? (Intro to Renegade Poetics)
- Goals
SSR, 3:20-3:30pm (Abbey)
- What’s the thesis?
- Do you agree with her argument in Renegade Poetics?
- Turn to the person next to you and discuss your structural outline (4-5 minutes).
- Does anyone else have anything else about anything in the introduction or SSR?
Activity, 3:30-3:55pm
Is this poem avant-garde? → yes, no (BAM and its legacy), it’s innovative (hula hoops!!!)
Did anyone write about this poem in their part B of the SSR? What did you write about?
- “the defense of marriage act, alternatives to” (G)
- “never after” (A)
- “you can’t deny it” (G)
- “Womanish” (A)
- “duck, duck, redux” (G)
- “my last modernist poem” (A)
- “statistical haiku” + “Johannesburg Mines” (G)
- “clare’s song” (A)
- “Dependencies” (G)
Poetry
- What else do you want to talk about?
Autobiography, 3:55-4:05pm (Abbey)
- Represent yourself and the identities you hold (that you want to share) in any form or media that you feel best represents you!
- Or do the same activity with a figure you’ve studied in this class!
Follow up questions:
- How does your self-representation differ from a traditional biography? Is there anything it captures that a biography (or a traditional autobiography) doesn’t?
- OR, if you did a figure, how does this representation differ from the ones you’ve done for class?