Breviary: how form, word and image model time

 

 

 

 

Title: Breviary
Author: Kevin Young
Illustrator: Ladislav Hanka
Translator: n/a
Printer/ Publisher (and location): Chad Oness of Sutton Hoo Press, assisted by Sidney Bauer (Houston, MN)
Date of publication: 2009
Edition: Limited printing, 100 copies
Price: $130

 

IMG_0126Physical Description:

  • 16 unnumbered pages (additional two covered by wrapper)
  • 3 hand-sewn signatures (two sheets per signature with deckle edges, four clean cut)
  • 11 poems
  • 28 x 11 cm
  • Perpetua font
  • Somerset paper (mouldmade 100% cotton, neutral pH, chlorine free, internal and surface sized)
  • Lichen-green, handmade flaxpaper wrapper with three deckle edges and stamped bird etching in darker green
  • Three illustrations – stamped black etching of sunflower (page two), stamped bird etching motif (title page in black and mid-book in brown-red)
  • One blind stamped image of a tree in a circle on recto of last sheet
  • Colophon printed after title page describes the limited printing and the contributing creators, this page also includes pencil marks that appear to be the poet’s signature

 

What strikes me first about Breviary – a collection of poems by Kevin Young, set and bound by Chad Oness of Sutton Hoo Press, with images by Hanka Lasislav – is its simplicity of form. From the folded wrapper that serves as a cover, to the short, end-stopped lines of poetry, to the loose-lined etchings, the holistic text is straightforward and structural, and yet, the hands of its three creators are all clearly evident in the product.

According to the Oxford Companion to the Book, a breviary is a liturgical book that contains the Roman Catholic Church’s Liturgy of the Hour; it is a simple, structural, chronological text text that grew out of the need to standardize liturgical practice. Under Chad Oness’ hand, Breviary draws structural inspiration from its namesake, while employing the strengths of word, image and form to create a holistic text that is simple, and yet seems to embody the theme of time’s passing.

Kevin Young is the acclaimed poet behind The Book of Hours, the collection of poems that Breviary draws its textual content from. Oness sets Young’s words in Perpetua, an unbraketed serif font that gives a nod towards Gothic scripts in its strokes and stresses, but is much simpler, cleaner and more modern. Wide margins – choice by the printer – and short line lengths ­– a choice by the poet – work together to draw the readers’ attention to the text and its content. The poems collectively address the passage of life and time, with themes of birth and grief. Breviary, in particular, begins with “Matins,” a poem that, as referenced by the title, is structured around the concepts of the morning and sunrise. Thus thematically, title, form and content are united in how they echo the passage of time.

In an interview at The Publishers’ Roundtable, hosted by Yale University in March 2008, Oness responded to a question about how he selects the artwork and poetry that will be paired together saying, “I have given artists manuscripts, however, and asked for their visual contribution, but I have always been clear with them, and talked extensively with them, about NOT ILLUSTRATING THE TEXT.” What Oness desires is a visual text that “has its own integrity separate from the manuscript,” and that is what we find in the artwork by Ladislav Hanka accompanying Young’s poems in Breviary. On his website, Hanka lists the illustrations from Breviary, in a paper binding, at $300, more than twice the list price of Breviary on the Sutton Hoo website. All the images draw on themes of nature, life, growth and fragility present in Young’s poetry. The acid etched lines of Hanka’s prints complement the decaled edges of both the handmade Somerset signatures and flaxpaper wrapper. Oness also uses Hanka’s illustrations structurally to echo the form of a breviary, which is structured around the passage of time. According, again, to the Oxford Companion to the Book, beginning in the Middle Ages, breviaries began to be divided into two sections to correspond with summer and winter; they were later divided into four sections, one for each season. Similarly, Oness uses the third iteration of Hanka’s bird-stamp motif to divide Breviary‘s eleven poems into two sections, Oness introduces a pause, a moment to recognize time’s passing, to a series of poems that are structurally unchanging; the first two iterations of the bird image are found on the wrapper and title page. Thus, once again, Oness connects title, structure and image to extend the theme of time beyond the word’s content into the text as a whole.

It would be remiss to overlook the choices the Oness makes as bookbinder, independent from the direct influence of the poet or illustrator. In his Publisher’s Roundtable interview, Oness reminded the audience, “the binding structure is a text in itself that joins the chorus early on in the reader’s experience of the book.” The experience of reading and moving through a book is particularly important to Oness. He comments in his interview on the importance, for him, that readers are able to open book flat his books, without the binding or form detracting for their ability to engage with the text. Breviary, which does open flat, is hand sewn in white thread; Oness’s small hand-tied knots are clearly visible at the center of the middle signature. He further reveals in his interview that he sees “the very labor and time intensive act of printing by hand” not just part of the process, but part of the product itself. The handcrafted, deckle edged papers Oness chooses further reinforce the time-intensive nature of the form. Thus, the physical product of the book, in how it embodies its production, serves as a physical reminder of the passage of time and how the text is connected to human experience.

Thus, Chad Oness, with Kevin Young and Ladislav Hanka, use word, image and form, to create in Breviary a text that holistically embodies the theme of time’s passage.

 

Edit (January 9) – added note on the colophon and a formal MLA citation for Breviary to the works cited, a clear oversight of my initial post. In citing the text in this manor, rather than in the itemized details at the top of the page, I realized how much recognition is goes to the author for the production of the work. The bibliographic reference, which we so often seem to hold as the primary form of identification for the text demonstrates how we privilege different forms of production and contribution to a work.

Works Cited and Consulted

“According to the Demands of the Text.” Publisher’s Roundtable. Yale University, 20 February 2008. Web. 6 February 2016.

“Beviary.” The Oxford Companion to the Book. Eds. Michael F. Suarez, S.J. and H. R. Woudhuysen. 1997. Web. 5 February 2016.

Hanka, Ladislav. ” Sutton Hoo Collaborative books.” Ladislav Hanka Official Site. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 February 2016.

“Somerset Printing Paper.” DickBlick. Dick Blick Art Materials, n.d. Web. 5 February 2016.

Strizver, Ilene Strizver. “Anatomy of a Font.” Fontology. Fonts, n.d. Web. 8 February 2016.

“Publishers Respond: Choosing a Publishing Model.” Publisher’s Roundtable. Yale University, 17 February 2008. Web. 6 February 2016.

Young, Kevin. “Book of Hours.” Kevin Young Official Site. n.p., n.d. Web. 8 February 2016.

 

Young, Kevin. Breviary. Houston: Sutton Hoo Press, 2006. Print.

4 Comments on “Breviary: how form, word and image model time

  1. Strength: I think my post was successful in examine and weighting the work of all of the creative contributors, and how the text is the result of their media intersecting and interacting.

    Work on: I think my post reads more like analytical literary essay, rather than a analytical bibliographic essay, despite the attention I gave to bibliographic features rather than the written. To address this I think I could have done a better job of explaining how my intention to focus to on the theme of time was to use it like a case study of how the creators and their mediums came together to produce this text, one of many themes, techniques or elements one could draw out as a way to structure the essay. Giving more attention to my conclusion would also assist with this.

    Think about: I would love to further explore the idea that noted in the end in my “edit” comment. This assignment challenged my narrow view of what bibliography is and why it is valuable. I had never thought about bibliography beyond citations and bibliographic references, but after writing this assignment the information we are asked to include in these references seem in sufficient. I know that often these references are to direct us back to other work, where we can do our own investigations and find out about all the contributors, but there is also a value placed on the names in a reference that often disregards the other contributors. “Breviary” would not be the text it is if not for Hanka and Oness, who aren’t listed in the standard bibliographic essay.

    I think I was snorkelling for this post, but it prompted some ideas that I want to dive into for the future.

    • I also welcome suggestions on how to remove the large white space between the title and the beginning of the text! When I go into edit the post, it doesn’t show any space in the window and there are no “return” lines or spaces to delete.

  2. Ela,

    Having your physical description set in bullet-point format–especially compared to mine, which was in paragraph format–makes for a quicker, more effective transmission of information. With the bullet-point structure, I am able to quickly find and use data, as opposed to hunting for the information within the more dense, wordy paragraph structure. This is something I wished I incorporated into my bibliographic essay!

    It appears that you begin the critical commentary with two claims: “the hands of its three creators are all clearly evident in the [text],” and that the text “seems to embody the theme of time’s passing.” While you highlight the significant contributions the three creators had with “Breviary,” it seems the bulk of your essay is concerned with how the text embodies the theme of time. I think perhaps narrowing your arguments to support one claim would be more effective, especially for this type of (read, brief) assignment. You begin some important analysis, starting with your identification of how Young’s poems parlay into this theme. Perhaps some more close-reading, even a direct quote from the poem, could help reinforce your claim!

    Judging from the bulk of essay, it seems you are more concerned with the form and structure of the book (which is great!), and how these too parlay into the theme of time. You begin some important work in these areas, especially drawing attention to how the font, margins, and short-line lengths draw the reader’s attention to the content, which are the time-themed poems themselves. How else might the font, margins, and short-line lengths reinforce (or perhaps contradict) the theme of the passage of time, as you mention at the end of your brief analysis? One way we can attack this is to do a comparison. How might this format of poetry compare to other formats of poetry? Let’s look at T.S. Eliot’s “The Waste Land” or Allen Ginsberg’s “The Howl,” which are pages (and pages!) of dense poetry, allusions, footnotes, obscure references–which as a result for many readers, require a significant amount of time to read. The shorter, more isolated poems in “Breviary,” by contrast, seem to eliminate the reader’s concern for length and subsequently, time. How might this add, or take away from your argument? Some more close readings–or snorkeling!–of the form would be effective here!

    The hand-crafting of the book certainly reinforces the theme of time, as you mention that the product of this text is a result of significant amounts of human time and energy. How else might the hand-crafted text reinforce the theme of the passage of time? What about the hand-made paper, or the hand-sewn signatures? Does this make the text appear older, antique? How does this juxtapose with the more modern font, the more modern poetry? The clashing of these polar extremes too could be a commentary on time, on how the past meets the future. Something more to think about, and snorkle/scuba-dive your way through!

    Ryan

  3. Strength: This is a wonderfully detailed essay, Ela. You provide us with rich historical and bibliographic context without lingering on technicalities. I admire your attentiveness to attributing each of the book’s qualities to the individual people responsible. I think you were wise to include the theme of time as a consideration the author and designers would have while structuring the text. As you were snorkeling along, I noticed that you never included information unless it contributed to overall argument. To me, this is a sign that you picked a topic that suited your book well, resulting in a concise essay that stays on target. Your breaks between paragraphs always seem to come at just the right time and I found myself really curious to hear more as your essay came to an end.

    Work on: You seem to share my love of run-ons! This bogs down the story you are trying to tell at some points. Fortunately, the content of the sentences is usually enough to keep me engaged while I am reading aforementioned run-ons. I would like to see more comprehensive transitions between paragraphs. Also, your Works Cited and Consulted is a bit out of order. Beyond that, my only complaint is about the repetition of certain phrases–“passage of time” and “deckle edges”–which causes those words to lose meaning. The thesaurus is your friend!

    Think about: Time always has a complex relationship to a text, but time is subjective. Your ruminations on time were intriguing, and I would have enjoyed seeing you explore your own timely interactions with text. For instance, how does your initial impression of the work compare to your final takeaway? How did time flow for you as you moved through the book? Better yet, what did the physical texture of the book tell you about its age? You end on a rumination of “the human experience,” but I think your argument would be stronger and more fun if I were able to read about YOUR human experience.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *